I'll present to you an arguement, take your stand whether you agree or disagree.
I am the only one that exists.
And by 'I', I mean my conscious efforts to normalize the playing field.
That means, if you have an 'I', then I don't exist in your playing field, other than a motional picture, able to react and act upon you and your normalization.
By this, I am the only thing in my universe, and you, the 'I' in you, is just another seperate universe, not parallel, not identicle, it's just simply not mine, it's not here not there.
I cannot, for the life of me, figure out if there is such a thing as crazy. I fear that if I accept the most far-out ideas that I have, I may not have a chance to ground myself again. I suppose this would be 'letting go' yes? Just let go, just go 'crazy'. Society's crazy definition.
So, do I exist in your eye, in your 'I'?
Or am I just a picture, an image from my universe being reflected on your plane, your movie screen?
Am I really there with you?
Perhaps this is love, when we can read one another's reality - a seperate entity, a seperate field.
Perhaps, I'm blind. Perhaps my ego has gone too far along a direction and I am wrong, and with little hope of ever finding the truth now. Or perhaps, perhaps... I've made this true. Perhaps my psychology has constructed this image, this view of my perception. Perhaps I have created this paradoxical multi-perceptional universe reality.
Why do I care, why should we care? We are just a fleeting difference from primal rage, yet we analyze it all, but cannot see.
Why so blind?
I guess this will be hard to respond to, heh
